The US Senate Intelligence Committee’s complete list of findings into CIA’s use of enhanced interrogation techniques on suspected terrorists.
- The CIA’s use of enhanced interrogation techniques did not effectively assist the agency in acquiring intelligence or in gaining cooperation from detainees.
- The CIA repeatedly provided inaccurate information to the Department of Justice, impeding a proper legal analysis of the CIA’s Detention and Interrogation Program.
- The CIA subjected detainees to interrogation techniques that had not been approved by the Department of Justice or had not been authorized by CIA Headquarters.
- The CIA did not conduct a comprehensive or accurate accounting of the number of individuals it detained and held individuals who did not meet the legal standard for detention. The CIA’s claims about the number of detainees held and subjected to its enhanced interrogation techniques were inaccurate.
- The CIA inaccurately characterized the effectiveness of the enhanced interrogation techniques to justify their use.
- The CIA’s use of enhanced interrogation techniques was brutal and far worse than the agency communicated to policymakers.
- The conditions of confinement for CIA detainees were brutal and far worse than the agency communicated to policymakers.
- The CIA impeded effective White House oversight and decision-making.
- The CIA has actively avoided or impeded congressional oversight of the program.
- The CIA impeded oversight by the CIA’s Office of Inspector General.
- Numerous internal critiques and objections concerning the CIA’s management and use of the Detention and Interrogation were ignored.
- The CIA manipulated the media by coordinating the release of classified information, which inaccurately portrayed the effectiveness of the agency’s enhanced interrogation techniques.
- The CIA was unprepared as it began operating its Detention and Interrogation Program more than six months after being granted detention authorities.
- The way in which the CIA operated and managed the program complicated, and in some cases hindered the national security missions of other Executive Branch agencies.
- Management of the CIA’s Detention and Interrogation Program was deeply flawed throughout its duration, particularly so in 2002 and 2003.
- Two contract psychologists devised the CIA’s enhanced interrogation techniques and were central figures in the program’s operation. By 2005, the CIA had overwhelmingly outsourced operations related to the program.
- The effectiveness of the enhanced interrogation techniques was not sufficiently evaluated by the CIA.
- CIA personnel who were responsible for serious violations, inappropriate behavior, or management failures in the program’s operation were seldom reprimanded or held accountable by the agency.
- The CIA’s Detention and Interrogation Program ended by 2006 due to legal and oversight concerns, unauthorized press disclosures and reduced cooperation from other nations.
- The CIA’s Detention and Interrogation Program damaged the United States’ global reputation, and came with heavy costs, both monetary and non-monetary.
(Information Source: Tish Wells, McClatchy Washington Bureau and Cryptome)
