<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Canary Trap &#187; Civil Liability for Nuclear Damages Bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://canarytrap.in/tag/civil-liability-for-nuclear-damages-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://canarytrap.in</link>
	<description>Let the people know the facts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:11:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is the Nuclear Liability Bill good for India?</title>
		<link>http://canarytrap.in/2010/08/22/is-the-nuclear-liability-bill-good-for-india/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=is-the-nuclear-liability-bill-good-for-india</link>
		<comments>http://canarytrap.in/2010/08/22/is-the-nuclear-liability-bill-good-for-india/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 17:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atomic Energy Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chernobyl Accident]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liability for Nuclear Damages Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Atomic Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FICCI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gopal Krishna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IAEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indian parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-US Nuclear Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lok sabha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manmohan Singh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Liability and Compensation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Liability Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Power Corporation of India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Price Anderson Act of 1956]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Srikumar Banerjee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union Carbide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UPA government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westinghouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WHO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canarytrap.in/?p=2129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Srikumar Banerjee, Chairman, Atomic Energy Commission and ex-officio Secretary, Department of Atomic Energy, one of the drafters of the Bill is guilty of ignoring the consequences of possible nuclear disaster because his text has privatized profits and made liabilities public. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, who is in-charge of Department of Atomic Energy, appears to be guilty of dereliction of duty as well. 

The Report of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Science &#038; Technology, Environment &#038; Forests chaired by T Subbirami Reddy reveals their culpability quite categorically.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://canarytrap.in/2010/08/22/is-the-nuclear-liability-bill-good-for-india/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nuclear Liability Bill, US Senate, and Indian Parliament</title>
		<link>http://canarytrap.in/2010/03/17/nuclear-liability-bill-us-senate-and-indian-parliament/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=nuclear-liability-bill-us-senate-and-indian-parliament</link>
		<comments>http://canarytrap.in/2010/03/17/nuclear-liability-bill-us-senate-and-indian-parliament/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Areva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liability for Nuclear Damages Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gopal Krishna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian nuclear liabilities bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indian parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-US Nuclear Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UPA government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canarytrap.in/?p=1691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A similar civil liability bill in the US Senate could have been thrown out. The US government appears confident that it can buy this Bill as well as our parliamentarians who remain imprisoned by party whips.

The proposed Civil Liability for Nuclear Damages Bill, which was to be introduced in the current Parliament session, is an exercise to provide State subsidy to foreign-nuclear reactor builders from the onus of the financial consequences of nuclear disasters, accidents and incidents.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://canarytrap.in/2010/03/17/nuclear-liability-bill-us-senate-and-indian-parliament/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UPA&#8217;s controversial Nuclear Liability Bill</title>
		<link>http://canarytrap.in/2010/03/12/upas-controversial-nuclear-liability-bill/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=upas-controversial-nuclear-liability-bill</link>
		<comments>http://canarytrap.in/2010/03/12/upas-controversial-nuclear-liability-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Areva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liability for Nuclear Damages Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian nuclear liabilities bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indian parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-US Nuclear Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Power Corporation of India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UPA government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westinghouse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canarytrap.in/?p=1649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In case of an accident due to the equipment supplied or any other external reason (design, construction), the damages would have to be paid only by the operator of the facility and not the supplier of the equipment (nuclear reactors) or the builder of the facility. 

In such a scenario, the foreign companies supplying the reactors will make profits and the state-run and public-funded NPCIL would be liable to pay the compensation in case of an accident. So, while the Indian people would get paid with their own money in case of an accident, foreign companies would make a killing. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://canarytrap.in/2010/03/12/upas-controversial-nuclear-liability-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

