<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Canary Trap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://canarytrap.in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://canarytrap.in</link>
	<description>Let the people know the facts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:59:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Nuclear Liability Bill, US Senate, and Indian Parliament</title>
		<link>http://canarytrap.in/2010/03/17/nuclear-liability-bill-us-senate-and-indian-parliament/</link>
		<comments>http://canarytrap.in/2010/03/17/nuclear-liability-bill-us-senate-and-indian-parliament/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Areva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liability for Nuclear Damages Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gopal Krishna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian nuclear liabilities bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indian parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-US Nuclear Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UPA government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canarytrap.in/?p=1691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A similar civil liability bill in the US Senate could have been thrown out. The US government appears confident that it can buy this Bill as well as our parliamentarians who remain imprisoned by party whips.

The proposed Civil Liability for Nuclear Damages Bill, which was to be introduced in the current Parliament session, is an exercise to provide State subsidy to foreign-nuclear reactor builders from the onus of the financial consequences of nuclear disasters, accidents and incidents by shifting the onus for accident liability from the foreign builders to the Indian State and citizens.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://canarytrap.in/2010/03/17/nuclear-liability-bill-us-senate-and-indian-parliament/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UPA&#8217;s controversial Nuclear Liability Bill</title>
		<link>http://canarytrap.in/2010/03/12/upas-controversial-nuclear-liability-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://canarytrap.in/2010/03/12/upas-controversial-nuclear-liability-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Areva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liability for Nuclear Damages Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian nuclear liabilities bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indian parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-US Nuclear Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Power Corporation of India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UPA government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westinghouse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canarytrap.in/?p=1649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In case of an accident due to the equipment supplied or any other external reason (design, construction), the damages would have to be paid only by the operator of the facility and not the supplier of the equipment (nuclear reactors) or the builder of the facility. 

In such a scenario, the foreign companies supplying the reactors will make profits and the state-run and public-funded NPCIL would be liable to pay the compensation in case of an accident. So, while the Indian people would get paid with their own money in case of an accident, foreign companies would make a killing. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://canarytrap.in/2010/03/12/upas-controversial-nuclear-liability-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Indians are being attacked in Afghanistan?</title>
		<link>http://canarytrap.in/2010/03/08/why-indians-are-being-attacked-in-afghanistan/</link>
		<comments>http://canarytrap.in/2010/03/08/why-indians-are-being-attacked-in-afghanistan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 10:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security & Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attack on Indian Embassy in Kabul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India-Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian Strategic Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R&AW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suicide attack in Kabul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taliban]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canarytrap.in/?p=1628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The attacks on Indians and Indian establishments in Afghanistan are rising in the last few years.  The Indian and Afghan government have blamed Pakistan for the deadly attacks. Pakistan, on the other hand, blames India for training Baloch and Sindhi insurgents from their bases in Afghanistan. 

The truth is that after the defeat of the Taliban (who captured power with the help of Pakistan), Afghanistan has become a new battleground for the India-Pakistan rivalry. Both the countries are trying their best to increase their influence in the country.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://canarytrap.in/2010/03/08/why-indians-are-being-attacked-in-afghanistan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Giving away Kashmir – Part 3</title>
		<link>http://canarytrap.in/2010/03/01/giving-away-kashmir-part-3/</link>
		<comments>http://canarytrap.in/2010/03/01/giving-away-kashmir-part-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canary Trap Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFSPA in Kashmir]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr Ajay Chrungoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr Farooq Abdullah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr Farooq Kathwari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights violations in Kashmir]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India-Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian Muslims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-Pak ties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jammu and Kashmir]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jammu and Kashmir Autonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jammu and Kashmir Autonomy Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kashmir problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kashmir Working Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manmohan Singh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Working Group on Centre-State Relations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canarytrap.in/?p=1611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The bogey of increasing international pressure is being crafted from within to target Indian public opinion at a time when dialogue with separatists is going on and Pakistan is unraveling from within. 

A section from within the government and the political establishment wants to present a compromise in Jammu and Kashmir as a deliverance to the nation from a perpetual confrontation, even if it means abandoning its frontiers, its people in the state, its civilisational responsibility, central features of its eco-heritage, secularism and everything which India stands for.     ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://canarytrap.in/2010/03/01/giving-away-kashmir-part-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Giving away Kashmir &#8211; Part 2</title>
		<link>http://canarytrap.in/2010/02/28/giving-away-kashmir-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://canarytrap.in/2010/02/28/giving-away-kashmir-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 18:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canary Trap Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr Ajay Chrungoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr Farooq Abdullah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr Farooq Kathwari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India-Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian Muslims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-Pak ties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jammu and Kashmir]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jammu and Kashmir Autonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jammu and Kashmir Autonomy Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kashmir problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kashmir Working Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manmohan Singh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Working Group on Centre-State Relations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canarytrap.in/?p=1601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A section of Indian State and political establishment seem to be allowing blatant falsehoods aimed at wrecking the sovereignty of the nation in Jammu and Kashmir in such a way so that public at large, not only in J&#038;K but in rest of India as well as internationally, is convinced that India has no case in J&#038;K. 

The deliberations in the Working Groups were also conducted in a manner to undermine all legitimate imperatives of national interests. Government of India is mirroring the attitudes which the British Government adopted in the build up to the partition of India.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://canarytrap.in/2010/02/28/giving-away-kashmir-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Giving away Kashmir &#8211; Part 1</title>
		<link>http://canarytrap.in/2010/02/27/giving-away-kashmir-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://canarytrap.in/2010/02/27/giving-away-kashmir-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 18:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canary Trap Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr Ajay Chrungoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr Farooq Abdullah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr Farooq Kathwari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India-Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian Muslims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-Pak ties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jammu and Kashmir]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jammu and Kashmir Autonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jammu and Kashmir Autonomy Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kashmir problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Working Group on Centre-State Relations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canarytrap.in/?p=1590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During former Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee's regime, a USA based Kashmiri secessionist leader, lobbyist and fund-raiser, Farooq Kathwari, arrived in India. He came with the full knowledge of the Indian government in March 1999, carrying a series of proposals for the creation of an independent Kashmiri State. 

At that time, both USA and the Indian government underplayed his jihadi connections. His son had died in Chechnya while fighting the Russians. He met very important persons belonging to Indian intelligence service and the ruling BJP. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://canarytrap.in/2010/02/27/giving-away-kashmir-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel inputs, terror alerts, and the Indian intelligence</title>
		<link>http://canarytrap.in/2010/02/26/terror-alerts-and-the-indian-intelligence/</link>
		<comments>http://canarytrap.in/2010/02/26/terror-alerts-and-the-indian-intelligence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security & Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don Cheadle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[German Bakery Blast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian Mujahideen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pune blast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SIMI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terror Cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terror hubs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terror Modules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism in India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traitor Movie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canarytrap.in/?p=1544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to security experts, Pakistan-based terror organizations -- with help from Inter-Services Intelligence -- have set up hundreds of terror cells/modules across India. A terror module is a functional unit  which includes one or more terror cells. Every cell works independently of the other and the handlers in Pakistan manage these cells without worrying about the Indian agencies. 

The recurring terror strikes in our country suggests that the Indian agencies does not have the required human intelligence about the numerous cells and modules that operate here. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://canarytrap.in/2010/02/26/terror-alerts-and-the-indian-intelligence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is Freemasonry?</title>
		<link>http://canarytrap.in/2010/02/22/what-is-freemasonry/</link>
		<comments>http://canarytrap.in/2010/02/22/what-is-freemasonry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr Rajendra Prasad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freemasonry in India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freemasons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JRD Tata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manoj Kewalramani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mansur Ali Khan Pataudi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motilal Nehru]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swami Vivekananda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canarytrap.in/?p=1546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Several American Presidents ranging from George Washington to Franklin Roosevelt have known to be members of the fraternity. Researchers argue that while the membership of a number of former presidents is known, even the more recent ones, including Barack Obama, belong to the fraternity, while Bill Clinton (though not a freemason) used to be a member of the Youth Order of DeMolay – a Masonic sponsored youth group.

In the Indian context too, several key members of the political, bureaucratic and judicial community along with former Maharajas have been freemasons. The list goes from Motilal Nehru, Dr Rajendra Prasad, Swami Vivekananda to even Mansur Ali Khan Pataudi and JRD Tata.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://canarytrap.in/2010/02/22/what-is-freemasonry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Pune mayhem and a sleeping India</title>
		<link>http://canarytrap.in/2010/02/20/the-pune-mayhem-and-a-sleeping-india/</link>
		<comments>http://canarytrap.in/2010/02/20/the-pune-mayhem-and-a-sleeping-india/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 09:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security & Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[German Bakery Blast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian intelligence agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian Mujahideen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jewish Chabard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lashkar-e-Taiba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maloy Krishna Dhar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan-sponsored terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pune blast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Riyaz Bhatkal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SIMI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism against India]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canarytrap.in/?p=1528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In simple language, there was complete intelligence blackout. None of the intelligence agencies had made any effort to penetrate the modules and cells which normally function from within the clustered Muslim areas in and around Pune and nearby towns. 

Such continuous failure to generate Human Intelligence and absence of sophisticated Electronic Intelligence is unpardonable.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://canarytrap.in/2010/02/20/the-pune-mayhem-and-a-sleeping-india/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Story of US&#8217;s Project Azorian</title>
		<link>http://canarytrap.in/2010/02/19/the-story-of-project-azorian/</link>
		<comments>http://canarytrap.in/2010/02/19/the-story-of-project-azorian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central intelligence agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Marine Development Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hughes Glomar Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project Azorian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russian Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soviet ballistic missile submarine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soviet G-II Class Submarine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soviet Navy Submarine K-129]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summa Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Colby]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canarytrap.in/?p=1492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is Project Azorian? It was a CIA codename for one of its most ambitious plan to recover a sunken Soviet submarine from the floor of the Pacific Ocean. A recently released CIA document, an article (Project Azorian: The Story of the Hughes Glomar Explorer) published in the fall 1985 edition of the agency's in-house journal Studies in Intelligence, details the events from conception and planning to the retrieval of the submarine in August 1974. 

The declassified document, in possession with Canary Trap, does not include all the information on the project as some of it is still considered highly sensitive.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://canarytrap.in/2010/02/19/the-story-of-project-azorian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
