I&B Ministry issues notices to TV channels

There was a huge uproar and debate in the Indian Parliament last week over a newly launched reality TV show Sach ka Saamna.

According to our politicians, Sach Ka Saamna — an Indian version of internationally acclaimed show Moment of Truth — is a threat to the Indian culture and should be banned.

The Information and Broadcasting Ministry issued a show cause notice to the channel that is airing the show. As the debate about whether Sach ka Saamna is good or bad continues, will the notice to the channel serve any purpose?

Recently, the I&B Ministry was asked in the parliament to provide details of the action taken by the government against channels airing violent and sexually explicit programmes. The facts that emerged out of the answer given my the I&B Minister of State C M Jatuya are interesting.

The I&B Ministry, from 2006 till July 14, 2009, issued 42 notices to various television channels (news and general entertainment) for airing violent and sexually explicit content. The maximum penalty awarded to a channel for airing content that violates the broadcasting laws is a ban of two months.

AXN channel was banned in India from 17.1.2007 to 28.2.2007 for telecasting a programme called World’s Sexiest Advertisements. Similarly, FTV was banned for two months after the order of 29.3.2007 for showing a programme called Midnight Hot.

Apart from this, the most erring channels were asked to do was to run a TV scroll apologising for airing the programme in question. Some of the instances are noted below.

1. IBN7 was served a show cause notice on 28.3.2007 for airing a programme called Kiss Par Rok Nahi. The channel was directed on 14.11.2007 to run a scroll apologising for the same for three days. The matter was then closed.

2. Zee News was also served a notice on 28.3.2007 for airing a programme called Jumma Chumma De De. The channel was directed on 14.11.2007 to run a scroll apologising for the same for three days. The matter was then closed.

Various channels have been repeatedly warned over airing sexually explicit programmes. Some of them are:

MTV: 4

  • For airing a song from the film Zeher
  • Showing a song from an adult film Aashiq Banaya Apne
  • Airing the New Axe Deo advertisement
  • Broadcasting sexually explicit reality TV show named Spiltsvilla

IBN7: 4

  • For airing a programme named Kiss Par Rok Nahi
  • Showing a programme named Kissa Kiss Ka
  • For telecasting a news item about crowd violence in Guwahati and beating of tribal women by men

India TV: 3

  • For using objectionable language on a programme called India Bol
  • Aairing a programme on Jhanvi Kapoor
  • For airing a programme named Ye Bachoo Ka Khel Nahi, which defamed the children

Other channels that received notices include AajTak, Channel V, Color, Discovery, ETV Bangla, Headlines Today, Hungama, India News, Star News, NDTV India, News 24, NE TV, Sahara Samay, Star Plus, Sony Max, Sun TV, UTV Bindaas, VH1, Yo Music,  and Zee Telugu.

Declassify 1962 India-China war report

The Delhi High Court on July 16 directed the Union government to place before it the Henderson Brooks-Bhagat Report. The court issued a notice to the government to file its response on a petition filed by veteran journalist Kuldip Nayar.

The report, lying with the Defence Ministry for over 45 years now, was a result of the government inquiry into the humiliating defeat at the hands of China in the 1962 border war.

The Government of India still treats the report as a classified document and have no concrete reasons for not making it public after so many years.

The Indian government’s record in declassifying past records is appalling compared to mature democracies like the United States where even war secrets are declassified after the usual 30-year period.

In the “world’s largest democracy”, important documents relating to our history are not made public on flimsy grounds.

The India-China war was an eye-opener for India. But even after 45 years, the people of India are not aware of the circumstances and reasons that led to India’s defeat. The popular belief among the masses is that China betrayed Indian trust and attacked our defences in the Ladakh and North East Frontier Agency (NEFA) region.

But the government inquiry into the defeat (Henderson Brooks-Bhagat Report – still classified but some details available in Neville Maxwell’s article on the 1962 war), the official history of the Government of India (1992), declassified documents from China and United States of America, and a huge amount of research on the subject by Indian analysts and experts reveal startling facts about the war.

If you want to read more about the subject, you can download the official Indian history of the war, which was published by the History division of the Ministry of Defence in 1992.

Government of India’s 1962 war history:

Was there a need for joint India-Pakistan statement?

The joint Indo-Pak statement, which was released after Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s meeting with his Pakistani counterpart on the sidelines of the NAM Summit in Egypt seemed to be an exercise in futility.

Barring one or two points, it was a confusing statement. India’s position till now has been that it would not  renew dialogue with Pakistan unless appropriate action is taken against the people responsible for the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks. But the statement states: “Action on terrorism should not be linked to the Composite Dialogue process and these should not be bracketed. Prime Minister Singh said that India was ready to discuss all issues with Pakistan, including all outstanding issues.” Does this mean that Manmohan Singh is ready to discuss all the other issues (including Kashmir) with Pakistan irrespective of whether there is any action against the Mumbai terror attack suspects residing in that country? If true, this is a major concession from the Indian side.

Pakistan also managed to get India to acknowledge that it too is a victim of terrorism. The statement says: “Both leaders agreed that terrorism is the main threat to both countries. Both leaders affirmed their resolve to fight terrorism and to cooperate with each other to this end.” This point dilutes India’s continued stand that terrorism directed towards it is directly/indirectly supported by the Pakistani state machinery. The perpetrators of terror attacks in Pakistan have different reasons and motivations compared to what is happening in India. By looking at the problem of terrorism in both the countries through the same prism will only hurt India.

The statement also mentions threats in Balochistan. It says: “Prime Minister Gilani mentioned that Pakistan has some information on threats in Balochistan and other areas.” Pakistan has long accused India of promoting secessionist activities in this region. This is the first time India has acknowledged Pak concerns of such activities in Balochistan. There have been accounts in various books by former Indian intelligence officials about India helping the Baloch people, who are fighting for independence. Did the Indian government suddenly realised that its past activities in Balochistan were wrong and that there would be no covert interference in Pakistan’s internal matters from now on?

The joint statement also mentions information sharing between the two nations on terror threats. It states: Both leaders agreed that the two countries will share real time, credible and actionable information on any future terrorist threats.” Having an information sharing mechanism or a joint anti-terror mechanism between the two countries is a mirage. News reports quoting Indian intelligence sources have repeatedly accused Pakistan Army and the ISI of providing moral and material support to the terrorists spreading violence in India. How then do we expect Pakistan to share information on future terror threats. Did they warn India about mujahideens crossing the Line of Control in Kargil or did they warn us about possible attacks on the Indian Parliament, Mumbai trains, Taj Mahal Hotel, Trident Hotel or Nariman House? Secret meetings between officials of both the countries may have taken place in the past but real time, credible and actionable information sharing with Pakistan is a bit too much to expect.

The statement is ambigious and sets no time frame to hold the “Composite Dialogue”. The unanswered question is whether India agreed to a joint statement and future dialogue only to please the United States or is there any policy thinking behind it.

Following is the text of Joint Statement issued after the meeting between the Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh and his Pakistani counterpart Syed Yusuf Raza Gilani in Sharm El Sheikh, Egypt on July 16, 2009:

“The Prime Minister of India Dr. Manmohan Singh and the Prime Minister of Pakistan Syed Yusuf Raza Gilani met in Sharm El Sheikh on July 16, 2009.

The two Prime Ministers had a cordial and constructive meeting. They considered the entire gamut of bilateral relations with a view to charting the way forward in India – Pakistan relations. Both leaders agreed that terrorism is the main threat to both countries. Both leaders affirmed their resolve to fight terrorism and to cooperate with each other to this end.

Prime Minister Singh reiterated the need to bring the perpetrators of the Mumbai attacks to justice. Prime Minister Gilani assured that Pakistan will do everything in its power in this regard. He said that Pakistan has provided an updated status dossier on the investigations of the Mumbai attacks and had sought additional information/evidence. Prime Minister Singh said that the dossier is being reviewed.

Both leaders agreed that the two countries will share real time, credible and actionable information on any future terrorist threats.

Prime Minister Gilani mentioned that Pakistan has some information on threats in Balochistan and other areas.

Both Prime Ministers recognized that dialogue is the only way forward. Action on terrorism should not be linked to the Composite Dialogue process and these should not be bracketed. Prime Minister Singh said that India was ready to discuss all issues with Pakistan, including all outstanding issues.

Prime Minister Singh reiterated India’s interest in a stable, democratic, Islamic Republic of Pakistan.

Both leaders agreed that the real challenge is development and the elimination of poverty. Both leaders are resolved to eliminate those factors which prevent our countries from realizing their full potential. Both agreed to work to create an atmosphere of mutual trust and confidence.

Both leaders reaffirmed their intention to promote regional cooperation.

Both Foreign Secretaries should meet as often as necessary and report to the two Foreign Ministers who will be meeting on the sidelines of the forthcoming UN General Assembly.”

Black Money: A revealing documentary by Frontline

This documentary by FRONTLINE correspondent Lowell Bergman investigates the shadowy side of international business, shedding light on multinational companies that have routinely made secret payments — often referred to as “black money” — to win billions in business.

Watch this very interesting story involving British aerospace giant BAE, the Saudi royal family, and an $80 billion international arms deal known as Al Yamamah, or “The Dove” in Arabic.

Watch the entire documentary here